this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3582 readers
78 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
Fluid@aussie.zone
bestusername@aussie.zone
eatham@aussie.zone
27
After ten years of fact-checking journalism at the ABC, the verdicts given to politicians say a lot about our political system (www.abc.net.au)
submitted 1 year ago by unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

I actually think that graph is much less useful than the other ones shown further down the article. A blunt three-point scale has nowhere near the necessary nuance compared to the full 9-point one. And the fact that it breaks apart median and mean is pretty handy too. For example we can see that Christian Porter, Clive Palmer, and Pauline Hanson occasionally say things that are very true (enough to bring up their mean) but that the majority—as in literally, at least half of the things that have been checked—are 100% made up, the worst possible score.