this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
825 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 249 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If it's not too hard to charge the fees it's not too hard to name them. Period.

[–] AnonymousLlama@kbin.social 105 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah that's the most brazen part. They're more than happy to pull in a dozen set of fees, but cry when they have to clearly list them so people aren't taken advantage of. This is the type of rubbish that the "free market" produces and why there needs to be some level of government oversight.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Too hard to list our fees" = "consumers will see how hard we're fucking them before they sign a contract"

[–] AccidentalLemming@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not like they have anywhere else to go. Frigging monopoly.

[–] balloflearning@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds like posturing to add a new fee for being required to list their fees if their weak argument gets thrown out by the FCC.

[–] takeda@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

With ISP what is really need is Local-loop unbundling but extending to ISPs.

Those that are old enough to use DSL in early 2000, might remember there was a lot of ISPs to chose from. The reason for it was that due to Title II telco companies were required to lease lines to their competitors. When cable started to be popular, ISPs lobbied politicians to categorize it under Title I which removed that requirement. We got Internet back to be categorized as Title II, but this specific rule was excluded and this is what is necessary to bring the competition.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago

Seriously. We've even pushed it onto cell providers, which has been great for consumers - yet we let ISPs push laws which make nonprofit community options illegal in many states

We've paid for their networks many times over at this point, and yet we still have some of the worst Internet in the developed world