this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
1391 points (98.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32042 readers
1305 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

So, essentially, really poorly written malware? Given the number of assumptions it makes without any sort of robustness around system configuration it's about as good as any first-pass bash script.

[–] excel@lemmy.megumin.org 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?

[–] Revolutionary_Pi@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

He said the thing!

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Packagers job to make it fit their distro, innit?

[–] GentooPhysicist@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a package maintainer, it's a lot of fun sometimes!

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha

[–] GentooPhysicist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Flatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.

[–] Vittelius@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Username checks out

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

I think it was a fun post about what we go through sometimes just to get X or Y working. It was quite clever.

[–] DrinkBoba@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Knusper@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wasn't sure about it either. There's security researchers out there who might genuinely want to get a virus to run in a VM.

But yeah, the cmalw-lib-2.0 gives it away...

[–] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, nobody uses cmalw-lib-2.0

Its deprecated, now we use hack-lib-client-1.17

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

systemd-malwared and its front-end malctl are how the cool kids are doing it.