this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30526 readers
221 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrickyNuance@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

With that strategy, we'd wind up with shell people holding copyrights on behalf of corporations.

Edit: Just wanted to add that I am definitely for the reduction of copyright duration, just that this particular solution has a somewhat amusing flaw.

[–] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well then make it impossible to transfer the copyright. In most jurisdiction it's not possible anyway. You can only licence it, not transfer.

I guess it might be difficult to figure out shared copyright in teamwork, but indie teams work just fine, and it's still a better option than corpus sitting on a golden pile of IPs.

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I like the idea of non-transferable copyrights a lot. That would make the "this is motivation for innovation / just protects inventors and artists" claim a lot more believable to me. I don't think it should even be passable to descendents/"estates".

And maybe also disallow "our employees' inventions/creative work copyright automatically goes to the company" clauses. This would be... Waaaay more complicated to sort out, but still worth thinking about imo.