this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
395 points (93.4% liked)

Today I Learned

17743 readers
176 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Two of us, Ellsberg and Noam Chomsky, testified for Assange at his extradition hearing last year. In Ellsberg's words then, the WikiLeaks publications that Assange is being charged for are "amongst the most important truthful revelations of hidden criminal state behavior that have been made public in U.S. history." The American public "needed urgently to know what was being done routinely in their name, and there was no other way for them to learn it than by unauthorized disclosure."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YaaAsantewaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Assange isn't an American citizen, it's disturbing to see so many psychopaths out for blood for the simple crime of telling the truth, especially when he's not even a citizen of said country which sets a very disturbing precedent.

the US is falling into the trap Russia wants, and if we had intelligent leaders, they would drop the charges and move on from it. We know Afghanistan was a failure and we know why, it's not a mystery anymore and the US doesn't even deny any of the wikileaks accusations so this entire witch-hunt is just disturbing at this point and does nothing to give anyone any confidence in this country

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The crime he is alleged to have committed isn't "telling the truth". He is being pursued for playing an active part in the crimes that Chelsea Manning was convicted of. The US government alleges he told her which files to get and might have actually played part in obtaining them.

The US government is not pursuing charges against Assange merely for speech but rather they allege he took part in the crimes directly.

[–] YaaAsantewaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's called "telling the truth"

Just because you attempt to hide crimes doesn't mean people have no right to expose them, it's simply a matter of being upset someone found out

And like I said, the US doesn't even deny any of the leaks, so the only reason they want to persecute an innocent person is an overtly authoritarian show of force. If we're going to simply abandon our principles willy-nilly whenever we feel like it then we're not a democratic country

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It isn't an act of speech when you directly hack government computers. It is not an act of protected speech to direct people in how to perpetrate crimes.

The notion that he is being charged for speech rather than taking an active role in the crimes is false. You can see it in the charges themselves.

He is being prosecuted for alleged acts he has allegedly taken not for sharing the information obtained from those hacks.

[–] davi@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

you're misinformed and making a silly argument based on your misinformation.

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"On 11 April 2019, the day of Assange's arrest in London, the indictment against him was unsealed.[60] He was charged with conspiracy to commit computer intrusion (i.e. hacking into a government computer), a crime that carries a maximum 5-year sentence.[61][62]

The charges allege that Assange sought to help Chelsea Manning crack a password hash so that Manning could use a different username to download classified documents. This "would have made it more difficult for investigators to identify Manning as the source of disclosures of classified information".[63][64][65][66] This allegation had been known since 2011 and is a less serious charge than those levelled against Manning, and carries a maximum sentence of five years.[67][68] The US pointed to chat logs and filed an affidavit that said they were able to identify Assange as the person chatting with Manning using hints he made during the chats and that Manning identified him as Assange to Adrian Lamo.[64][69]"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indictment_and_arrest_of_Julian_Assange#:~:text=He%20was%20charged%20with%20conspiracy,a%20maximum%205%2Dyear%20sentence.

No Im right on the money here

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

What did they charge Al Capone with?

[–] YaaAsantewaa@lemmy.blahaj.zone -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then you either work for the government or you're a Trump voter, there's no other option here

[–] gowan@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Or you really bad at thinking. That's the third and almost certain option as Im neither of those things.

The charges are public. You can see what he has been accused of. It is not a secret.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a matter of intimidating possible future leakers.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"Telling the truth" and "Asking someone to steal classified information to be selectively revealed in order to further the interests of Russia" aren't identical concepts.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Dude dropped a bunch of stuff from well before that. What's more they caught him editing the stuff he dropped to make it look like war crimes were committed, interfere in our elections, and to damage US relations with other countries.

Then they managed to to track some of his material back to the GRU. This is not the Pentagon Papers