this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
942 points (97.3% liked)

Memes

45681 readers
2218 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] green_biri@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I might be a bit dumb here, but I never got the detachable radio idea/need?

The radio interfaces were not exchangeable between different brands, right? Or was there an universal interface that I am unaware of?

Wouldn't a bad actor need to dismantle the entire radio head as well, for the interface part to be of any good use?

[–] youngalfred@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

It wasn't so much to not steal the interface, it was to not steal the whole unit from the car.

If the front was left attached, a thief would break in and steal the whole radio.

With the front off, it's basically useless to steal the in car part.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

its anti theft because the unit doesnt work without the face and they were married with a code. car radio theft was rampant in the early 90s

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Thieves would also steal the entire stereo head unit -- so many had an additional anti-theft feature.

If you wanted to remove the head unit you had to enter a code using the front plate buttons before you uninstalled it. If you didn't it would "brick" itself to discourage theft.