this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
912 points (86.8% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
800 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glockenspiel@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Btw, the dictatorship of the proletariat, aka communist dictatorships are just fascist states in disguise, concentration camps and totalitarian bullshit included.

You clearly are not educated in communist ideology and philosophy. "Dictatorship of the proletariat" does not mean a literal dictatorship of a singular person or even a small group.

The dictatorship of the proletariat means that the entire working class, as a people, collectively own and run the entire state. As opposed to what we have in the world today, which is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie--either outright dictators, monarchs, or increasingly the tiniest fraction of the ultra rich controlling everything.

One person controlling a state with an iron fist, like Stalin, is not a dictatorship of the proletariat. The working class controlling the state is. It is called a "dictatorship" not because a singular person controls it, but a singular class. The largest class. The class of almost everybody but a fraction of a percent of outliers.

No country on Earth today has a dictatorship of the proletariat, because only the monied elite get to control the government. Whether it be through bribery (lobbying), captured government, literal monarchies (even if "symbolic", they still have massive sway given their expansive wealth), literal dictatorships, theonomic regimes, elite and rich leaders of military juntas, etc.

There's a reason that only the rich attend summits like Davos. There's a reason nearly every country has golden passport/golden visa schemes which let the rich effectively buy citizenship.

The ultra rich, the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, have strong class solidarity. That is why the world is the way it is.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, I've always seen the dictatorship of the proletariat argument to defend the fact that every communist country ends up devolving in a dictatorship.

If you remove that excuse, then I might start thinking that the issue is with communism in itself and we might need to look around for a new theory.

[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then you clearly have not understood the argument.

Btw even the CIA stated that the idea of Stalin being some megalomaniac dictator is nonsense. Turns out your entire premise is based on you not getting the topic in the first place.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or maybe you haven't? If no communist country has the dictatorship of the proletariat, a democracy or even a decentralized government like a communion of soviets, then what does it leave? Just a normal, shitty dictatorship (or pseudo-monarchy in case of NK).

Still, I don't understand the cheering for brutal dictators. Why the fuck would you what that? Saying Stalin wasn't "actually that bad" is akin to saying that about Hitler or Mussolini or Pinochet or any other brutal selfish dictator. Fuck that.

[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. These countries never claimed to be communist. They called and call themselves socialist.
  2. All of them Were and are Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Which can be noticed by billionaires getting sentenced to death for real evil shit, instead of going free like in out Dictatorships of the Bourgoisie. I recommend Lenins "State and Revolution" as a easy introduction.
[–] Rinox@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. What are you even on about? What does CCP/CPC stand for in your opinion?

  2. The other commenter said they are not dictatorships of the proletariat. Make up your mind guys

[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. Communist Party of China. The vanguard party of the chinese proletariat, made up of scientific, revolutionary socialists (commuinists).
  2. That person was a ultraleftist. In other words a person who treats communist theory as religion, not science. Their opinion goes against the one of over 90 million communists of the CPC alone.
[–] Rinox@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, he's no true Scotsman