this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
277 points (94.8% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2413 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When considering these externalities for nuclear, you have to do the same for renewables as well. i.e. scrap turbine blades, concrete in dams, weathered PV panels, land use taken up by panels and turbines.

Remember that the materials used in most renewable generation are also shipped around the world and many have very dirty refining processes.

I'm a firm renewable energy supporter but you have to be fair to both processes.

You neglect the problem that the stuff from a nuclear reactor is literally unusable forever and becomes Special waste while the remains of renewables are recyclable, yes even turbine blades, there is just not enough market for it to attract a business so far, that will change of course with time, also the stuff is not toxic or radioactive...

Remember that the materials used in most renewable generation are also shipped around the world and many have very dirty refining processes.

Depends, newer version of the stuff don't need rare earths, or much less, meaning the dirtiest of it falls out of the equation.

I am fair, nuclear is just not future proof for large scale usage. It also takes to long to be "effective" 10 years to build one powerplant, and is waaaay to expensive. you could build more actually renewables for less money in the same time and the electricity from it is basically free as there are almost no operational costs.

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay.

Make a PV system out of a strict subset of the materials in the reactor.

Put the PV system over top of Inkai mine.

Get more power than the uranium from the mine would produce for longer.

The 40 year guaranteed lifetime of the panels is longer than the 30 year lifetime of the average nuclear plant at shutdown.

Your materials can be recycled after.

The ground around the mine isn't poisoned with heavy metals permanently,

This all assuming everything goes perfectly for the nuclear plant and waste disposal.