this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
277 points (94.8% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2507 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is reliability, Europe sees more and more droughts building energy facilities that turn useful water into useless steam makes little sens when there are other options.

Also nuclear makes Sweden dependant on a country thaz exports nuclear fule.

And for solar the costs are shrinking and shrinking, the newest and most efficient panels don't even need rare earths anymore and are recyclable. Btw Sweeden would be better suited for Hydroelectric dams and Wind wich have even less such problems.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sweden?

Drought?

Anyway I'm not a civil engineer or geologist or renewable energy engineer or anything, so I won't pretend to know what the best path is. I'm just hoping they did their studies correctly and are picking the best option.

But even if they're not, it's good they're moving away from fossil fuels, whichever direction they move in.

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well no, that's the thing. They've replaced moving away from fossil fuels now with promising they're going to in 2045