Edit: was reading the first response in my inbox and wondering what the guy was talking about. Then reread my comment and noticed the typo. Leaving it up now because I don’t think without the typo my comment would have seen this level of engagement.

[–] Tehgingey@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Crazy what a few feet can do to public perception

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Public perception won’t stay that way furlong

[–] Badtouchspez@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have to metre my expectations with what the public will do.

[–] Angry_Maple@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

When I see clouds behind someone (especially in shots with angles like this), I tend to think that they are legitimate clouds unless there is obvious Photoshop. There was a very long time where natural lighting was preferred over artificial lighting for shots like this.

Why would someone go through the immense effort to make artificial lighting look like natural lighting when natural lighting is already there and it's completely free?

Are photoshopped clouds more normal than legitimate clouds now? Did I miss something?

[–] Atrabiliousaurus@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I remember there was a kerfluffle about an Instagram influencer with the same clouds everywhere she went. There are filters for it apparently.

[–] Xanvial@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

But, you need to go outside yo do that

[–] Tehgingey@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for being a good sport, I meant no malice, just a funny typo ahah