this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
205 points (98.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
1136 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] puppy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Public transport isn't supposed to "pay for itself". How about asphalt roads in your area, have they paid for themselves?

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes via the commerce that results in taxes. But the pint is that public transit does not get built unless you can convince law makers that it will be cheaper than any alternative to the government’s pocket.

[–] puppy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Road related taxes are not even enough for maintaining roads let alone build them. Watch the below video from the 3.18 mark.

https://youtu.be/QPAil1xY42I?t=191

Tell me this, if your sparsely populated area justifies asphalt roads because of the "resulting commerce", why can't public transport achieve the same?