Asklemmy

43531 readers

2023 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

If you could introduce a few obscure/minor laws to your country, which ones would you choose that would make the most positive or interesting impact? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 years ago by k_o_t@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

i'd probably pick

cartoon tv series can't have more than 3 seasons
avocados should have most subsidies of any food
electron apps are now illegal
normal tv series can't have more than 5 seasons
protruding doorsteps are now illegal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A company cannot have more than 200 employees in the same city.

Non-federated social networks are illegal.

[–] mukt@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

This should end the need for entire professional degree called MBA.

[–] southerntofu@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A company cannot have more than 200 employees in the same city.

How about adding a clause about "there can be no managers nor bosses or shareholders"? :)

[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who is gonna run the company then? If you this with my team, chaos follows.

[–] southerntofu@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe for a few days/weeks, but don't you think sharing information and power with everyone can lead to sane consensus? I'm unaware of your specifics, but i would argue that in most productive and service branches, self-organization would lead to much better outcomes in all regards. Workers self-organization has a good track record throughout history. "Autogestion, l'encyclopédie internationale" is a good resource in french about self-organization across time and space (in ten volumes), but unfortunately i don't know of such detailed accounts in english language.

[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I am just suggesting it is not for everybody. I do agree that sharing responsibility yields better results.