this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2020
1 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43917 readers
1751 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Namely, do you think it has a future in the wave of next gen clean energy sources? If you support it, do you think it will always be viable or that it should only be a temporary measure to get us off fossil fuels while our renewable infrastructure grows?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] SnowC0de@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 years ago (2 children)

I spent a lot of time discussing with French people in YouTube comments. And I need to say that a lot of beliefs of nuclear energy are wrong.

  • France got a very good re-processing of nuclear wastes
  • Nuclear energy is the energy with the smallest mortality rate compared to any other energy. The worst being coal with 2 deaths per removedt
  • Nuclear energy is still pretty clean on a pollution side.

I don't like this energy but trying to throw it away, without reducing the demand, sounds impossible to me.

Something I really regret about nuclear energy though is the fact that you are completely dependent on other countries and industries.

So another belief (on the side of pro-nuclear this time) is the fact that it makes you independent of your own electricity. Except that all your uranium is coming from another countries, this is not what I call "independent".

TL;DR: I don't like centralization of the electricity production. But with the current demand, it's the only viable choice.

[โ€“] Scholar_Succulent@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

Could you alborate on your first claim ?

France got a very good re-processing of nuclear wastes

[โ€“] SnowC0de@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 years ago

They seem very advanced in the control of nuclear waste and know how to reprocess a good part of them. Everything is contained securely and they don't seem to have any space problem with it. It's the "ANDRA" (National Agency for the Management of Radioactive Waste) who do all of that.

[โ€“] dessalines@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 years ago (1 children)

I'm still on the fence about nuclear, and centralized vs decentralized energy production (bc decentralized relies on batteries where the materials are mined under terrible conditions, not to mention the batteries themselves are terrible for the environment) . I wonder if anyone's done a comparison of nuclear vs solar, in terms of waste byproducts and mining ethics, bc I bet its probably closer or even possibly more in favor of nuclear than many think.

[โ€“] SnowC0de@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 years ago

Yes there are people who made that comparison. Solar is much worse than nuclear energy.