this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2023
337 points (97.7% liked)

Privacy

31821 readers
247 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can argue its misleading but I disagree. Outsourcing bad behavior to a third party doesn't remove culpability on your part. This is all to common these days and allows both parties to point fingers at each other while nobody faces any responsibility for breaking the law, violating people's rights, and/or unethical behavior.

The FBI just using assumptions and impressions on methodologies used by the company they contracted with is no excuse when they could have asked how the work was going to be performed. Incompetence is no excuse either.

[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not saying the FBI should be excused for this. I'm saying the title is factually wrong and is designed to provoke attention

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Even with that I think it's debatable. They were employed by the FBI at the time of usage so it isn't totally inaccurate to say it was the FBI doing it and we don't know what knowledge the FBI guys had of the company's methods.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

The good news is the FBI cut the relationship. I'm not sure if that was because of public pressure or there desire to do the right thing