this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2021
25 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31874 readers
661 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
k_o_t@lemmy.ml
tmpod
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
ranok@sopuli.xyz
25
Apple sues Israeli spyware firm NSO Group (www.bbc.com)
submitted 3 years ago by pingveno@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (10 children)

I know people give Apple a lot of shit (and they deserve it, all big companies should be public property). But as far as capitalists go, they're the only megacorp that isn't entirely evil from the ground up. They could choose to do none of these stunts, and they'd still make billions, yet here we are.

[–] krawieck@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago (1 children)

i have to strongly disagree. they do a lot of stuff that would be regarded as evil: making their devices as hard to repair as possible, fucking over independent developers, pushing their subscriptions inside of iOS ("get Apple Arcade/Music/TV Free for 3 Months!" with hopes that you forget about them charging your card). the bottom line is that privacy (or rather the perception of privacy) is their brand so they have to do things that reinforce it in minds of their users.

[–] sibachian@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 years ago

the main reasons for the move to subscription (by everyone) are as following:

  1. consumer protection laws - laws haven't caught up, there are none for subscriptions that benefit consumers (can't get refunded if a company choose not to refund - apple does, though).
  2. finite wallet - every company's goal is to take a share out of your salary each month, subscriptions guarantee it, and in apples case, that's a 30% cut. There is more money to be made if you tie your finite wallet up into their ecosystem rather than you splurging on apps when you have extra cash.
  3. skeleton crew - if you tie people up with subscriptions, you don't have to work on active development and can hire a cheap skeleton crew to maintain the software.

but yes, i'm well aware that they operate on walled garden principle. who isn't? but that's literally capitalism, exercised by a capitalist company. right to repair is the exact same principle. while i disagree with both practices, they aren't unethical, they are required by the concept of capitalism. it's literally playing by the rules of capitalism. beyond these two political moves, which aren't unethical, just capitalism at work (which could be argued to be unethical - but that's a different discussion altogether); they do a lot of work on privacy for their platform, work that doesn't matter, they'd still make billions with or without the gesture. they actively CHOOSE to protect user privacy, for no benefit to themselves and their platform other than looking pretty to consumers, consumers who would buy their stuff regardless of their effort. and hey, are you really going to say it's a bad thing they're fucking with both spotify and facebook?

when did they fuck over independent developers?

load more comments (8 replies)