Asklemmy

43948 readers

999 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

331

What discontinued feature do you miss from phones or other technologies? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BigMoe@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

474 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For me its the 'Knock Code' that LG had on their phones (I really wish LG still made at least the V series phones)

Basically there was a four-square area and you set up a sequence of where you would tap to unlock the phone. That set of squares was only shown when you set up the code

Then, to unlock your phone, you would tap those areas in the sequence you set up (even with the screen off).

Fingerprint readers are nice, but I really do miss the knock code

Edit: did find this article with a way to do the knock code, but if done wrong, could brick your phone I guess.

Plus, article is from 2014. When I looked at XDA's info on it (they also being the developers) it looks like development on it is over, but individual modules may or may not still be supported by their devs

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AcesFullOfKings@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

but the notch doesn't eat into your screen space. You get more screen with a notch, as the screen is expanded upwards into what would have been the bezel, just not where the camera is. I'd much rather take the extra screen space on the same size device, even if it means changing the screen's shape.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My monkey brain wants symmetry, a notch prevents that. And for privacy purposes, small notches make it harder to neatly cover the camera

[–] xx3r@lemmy.studio 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Buy new phone
Switch to 3-bottom navigation
Hide display cutout

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

But then, monkey brain loses screen space

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed. I keep the notch hidden at all times so effectively I just moved my status bar away from the screen.

[–] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And you'd have even more screen space if the notch was filled in and people didn't screech like howler monkies because their phone has a tiny bezel.

[–] ImaginaryFox@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Samsung handles it nice where you can hide the cutout on a per app basis, and doing so doesn't move the status bar down but keeps it where it is. With the amoled display it looks like a normal status bar with the notch or pinhole camera not being obvious.

I'm not sure why some phones don't give that option, since if you do they shift down the status bar below the notch instead of just turning it black. Such a simple software solution.