this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
610 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59092 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I think we need all support we can get to fight Google on this, so I welcome Brave here actually.

Use this link to avoid going to Twitter:

https://nitter.kavin.rocks/BrendanEich/status/1684561924191842304

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] static_motion@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget that he inflicted the blight that is JavaScript upon the world.

[–] EuphoricPenguin22@normalcity.life 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

JS is one of the most fun programming languages ever created; how dare you slander its great name.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

sure mate, just tell me the result of the following without trying it out.

0 && 1 && false

[–] EuphoricPenguin22@normalcity.life 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If I remember correctly, 0 and 1 are considered falsy and truthy respectively, so it should be falsy and truthy and false which I believe would return false.

Tried it out to double-check, and the type of the first in the sequence is what ultimately is returned. It would still function the same way if you used it in a conditional, due to truthy/falsy values.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

yes, that is a solid logic, one that I also applied and expected to be the result.

that is until a Vue component started complaining that I am passing in a number for a prop that expects a boolean.

turns out the result of that code is actually: 0, because javascript

of course if you flip it and try

false && 0 && 1

then you get false, because that's what you really want in a language, where && behaves differently depending on what is on what side.

[–] EuphoricPenguin22@normalcity.life 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was incorrect; the first part of my answer was my initial guess, in which I thought a boolean was returned; this is not explicitly the case. I checked and found what you were saying in the second part of my answer.

You could use strict equality operators in a conditional to verify types before the main condition, or use Typescript if that's your thing. Types are cool and great and important for a lot of scenarios (used them both in Java and Python), but I rarely run into issues with the script-level stuff I make in JavaScript.