this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
777 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
3167 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 196 points 1 year ago (7 children)

According to Hwang, the company now formerly known as Twitter did offer "an alternative handle with the history of the @x account" so that his original account, complete with its posts and followers, could live on and continue to be used.

What short, catchy username did Musk's company change Hwang's handle to? @x12345678998765.

You can't make this shit up. God damn!

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

that sounds like what an idiot would have for a password.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

So you are saying one could log into @x with that...

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quick someone check if it’s Elons password!

[–] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah his password would definitely include an "42069" in it.

[–] elvith@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

Did you try xXx42069NoScopexXx?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the same password I have on my luggage!

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who the hell downvoted an Airplane! quote?

[–] mtnwolf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe someone who hasn't see Airplane.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I refuse to believe there are people like that. I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue.

[–] xaxl@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

However, Hwang tells me, he was also offered a new handle of his choice – as long as it's available. He just hasn't picked one yet.

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] sam@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago

"as long as it's available" is as good as nothing imho.

[–] mtnwolf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Since his handle is being taken against his will, he should get to take someone else's handle against their will. Then let it be a chain reaction.

[–] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 15 points 1 year ago

The first twelve trillion were already taken to be fair

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Musk probably wanted to make it @x42069.

[–] like47ninjas@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That is absolutely hilarious. They should've offered him @twitter in exchange, it would only be fair...

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's be real now. That name is temporary until he chooses his new one. Read the whole article. It's rediculous enough without making things seem even worse.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But look at that username. It definitely not randomly generated. Someone at Twitter pick that new name. They just give someone with the shortest username possible (1 character) the longest possible username (15 characters), and they do so by pressing the number row back and forth until they hit the username characters size limit. If it's not a mockery then I don't know what is.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not mockery, it is the logical thing to do. They don't want to allocate a username a person would actually want, so naturally they pick the longest possible username, with arbitrary and meaningless contents. Would you have been happier if it was @xloremipsumdolo? @xtemporaryusern? Like what was the right thing for the technician who had to pick the name to do, in your mind?

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I thought long and hard about this, and you're right. If it were me, no matter what the new username is, I'm still going to be mad. But I feel like I'll be less mad (just a little bit less) if they select a completely random username (with sensible length, like 8 characters or less), indicating it's chosen by an impartial random number generator instead of chosen by someone who in my mind is messing with me (image of Elon Musk laughing at me coming in my mind).

[–] Valmond4@lemmy.mindoki.com 2 points 1 year ago

All for the buzz I imagine.

Or for some hyper inflated fragile ego I guess.

Well that's my guess.