this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
815 points (98.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32536 readers
565 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

NIST removed password expiration from their recommendations in 2020. Instead they recommend only forcing password changes when compromise is suspected.

The main argument is that they do not make users or systems demonstrably safer and encourage bad password habits.

[–] Reddit_Is_Trash@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

I would imagine most users change their password by only 1 character, and maybe even in sequential order.

When time comes to change the password, it becomes password1234 instead of password123. Or password234. Something easy to remember, most users don't care about best security practices, and changing to a similar password is very convenient. Especially if it's "only" for work stuff

[–] pkulak@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

The original idea was that you would take how long it took to brute-force a password, then require the password be changed before that. But we have better hashing now, like bcrypt, where you can tune it so that brute forcing anything would take 100s of years.