this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
186 points (96.0% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3604 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Proweruser@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I agreed. Additionally it has to be not too bulky and cheap. Mi Band does the trick in my experience.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I got one a few years back. The heart rate tracking is piss-poor, but for £20 I wasn't expecting much.

[–] Proweruser@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How did you figure out it was piss poor? Compared with another tracker?

It certainly shows my heart rate going up by a lot when I'm in the gym.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I've got a Mi Band 6 and I think it guesses based on activity half the time. I just sat still and shook mine about, and it reckoned I was well over 120bpm, but manually checking and it's barely over 1 beat a second. Being half or double what it should be seems pretty common.

It could be because I've got hairy monkey arms, but my wife also found it to be poor with her old FitBit (which has shockingly bad phone connectivity instead) keeping much better track of it during exercise.

It's nothing vitally important, but you probably shouldn't use it for any actual athlete stuff.