this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
2303 points (98.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54443 readers
1128 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

looks like rendering adblockers extensions obsolete with manifest-v3 was not enough so now they try to implement DRM into the browser giving the ability to any website to refuse traffic to you if you don't run a complaint browser ( cough...firefox )

here is an article in hacker news since i'm sure they can explain this to you better than i.

and also some github docs

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Im28xwa@lemdro.id -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There is already a manifest v3 compatible version of ublock origin so can someone explain to me how it gonna end ad blockers?

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That version can do much, much less.

Edit: see my other comment here: https://beehaw.org/comment/727017

[–] Im28xwa@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks will look into it

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because that version of ublock is already less effective. The long play is ending ad blockers and this is another step to achieve those ends. If you can't see that then I'm sorry but it can't be much more obvious than it already is.

[–] Im28xwa@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

Hmm I think I need to read more about Manifest v3 as it appears my knowledge of the topic is pretty limited to literally just "v3 will kill ad blockers", basing my understanding on a couple of comments and 2 news report videos is a bad thing to do, don't you agree

[–] redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

uBlock Origin is already less effective when running in Chrome than in Firefox. For example, it can't detect CNAME cloaking on Chrome, while it can do that in Firefox. When Chrome finally enforce manifest V3, uBlock Origin will be even more neutered in chrome due to limited number of blocking rules.

[–] Im28xwa@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

That's a pretty interesting thing to know! Thanks