this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
546 points (86.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29675 readers
2074 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I can't really think of a reason for that as Reddit is hated somewhat equally by "both" sides of the spectrum. It's just something I find interesting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 148 points 1 year ago (3 children)

progression tends not to be conservative

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm afraid future will be conservative nevertheless due to the simple fact that they're the only ones making kids. I'm liberal myself but I don't have kids and will never have so my traits don't pass to the next generations. The conservative neighbours with 7 kids on the other hand..

[–] mindbleach@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Politics being genetic, of course.

What?

[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Politics aren't genetic.

But they ARE communal. Where you grow decides 90% of what you believe in.

It's actually why I disagree with the top comment chain that smarter means more left leaning. I think it's more that left leaning communities have better education standards and lead to smarter generations. Cause and effect reversed.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

The ability to propagate the politics depends mightily on the success of the community though. It's sort of the other side of the 'brain drain' principle-- if people have to leave the community for educational or economic opportunity, they're probably not going to be able to reconstruct the same echo chambers.

Even when you see a preserved group within a larger population (think of Chinatowns and Little Italies), they're inherently getting a lot more cultural exchange than back in the home country.

A lot of the most self-destructive policies (neglecting education, running the environment into the ground, skate-where-the-puck-was-in-1972 economic policy) are just begging for decades of brain drain. The kids are going to leave because there's simply nothing there but the Gizzard Extraction Plant, and that got automated in 2032.

[–] _finger_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

In some ways yes but it can have the opposite effect too. I know lots of left leaning people who grew up in super religious/conservative families and hate everything about their beliefs.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What top comment chain? They're all talking about Reddit censoring leftists, not talking about the intelligence of any faction. The most I've seen are people making fun of the right, but that's to be expected.

[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the thread's first reply chain if you sort by top:

https://lemmy.world/comment/1614009

Federation may make things wonky I guess.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Okay. I read that post, nowhere did it come off as patronizing at all, and it holds people accountable foe having basic knowledge which is an expectation of most adults in society, so I don't see how the anti-intellectualist garbage is in any wa valid here.

[–] LambdaDuck@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago

politics aren’t genetic, but they are obviously still inheritable

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

Is that controversial? Look around..

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

If you take in account that they're raised in their parents' household it's not ridiculous

[–] bibliotectress@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't know. I think it depends more on where they grow up and who/what they're exposed to (in person and online). At the high school I work at, we have a bunch of lgbtq+ teens whose conservative parents have no idea they're queer or go by a different name. But I also don't live somewhere like Wyoming with a much higher conservative population. I live in a college town in a (barely) blue county surrounded by red counties in an ultimately very blue state.

I hope we find a way to kill the online radical right pipeline and continue to expose more teens to other ideas, other cultures, and other ways of life, and maybe it won't matter so much who their parents are.

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A blue county surrounded by red counties in an ultimately very blue state

Tell me you live in California without telling me you live in California

[–] Hobbes@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

Speaking of Reddit, here's an overused response that needs to be left behind with all the other unoriginal crap responses.

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Only if we can kill the online radical left pipeline too. Too many tankies

[–] JTode@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The thing about that is, if they're ignorant, their kids will be ignorant too. And what that adds up to is just the same thing we've got: a large group of people who are subject to whatever momentary persuasion happens to reach them on any given day, and a political/ruling class that can work with that just fine, so they are taking steps to hamper education sufficiently that this can endure for an indeterminate amount of time before we all burn.

What those large populations do react to, is missing a meal or three. And so far, these aristocrats seem to understand that whatever else they try to pull, they must always service the fundamentals: bread and circuses.

See you at the coliseum.

[–] Teodomo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But if that logic held wouldn't religion tend to increase instead of decrease?

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah it probably will. We'll see in the next few decades. Aging population and low birthrates are much bigger problems that most people realize. Increasingly small amount of workers has to cover the living costs of the increasing numbers of retirees.

[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Well by definition right?
Progressive outlook means your open to new ideas, exploring new territory, open to concept that challenge what you think and know, and gives you the ability to push boundaries, make new discoveries and try new things.

Conservative outlook on the other hand means you are content and safe with the familiar, doing things the way they have always been done because its tried and true, however this means if they feel unconfortable or threatened by ideas which are going to change the way the live and how things work which makes them dig their heels in and get defensive.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The progressive/conservative axis has nothing to do with the economical left/right, it was only forcefully merged in the USA because they have only two parties.

[–] lieuwex@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I find it so ironic that the comment above you is literally saying that being progressive means challenging what you [think you] know, but you are being downvoted by (I assume) people who call themselves progressive, without any discussion.