this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
80 points (94.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43350 readers
2270 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
mekhos@lemmy.ml
tmpod
14specks@lemmy.ml
80
What have you found to be an effective way to tell if you're chatting with a bot or a real person? (lemm.ee)
submitted 1 year ago by original_reader@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
92 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sometimes it can be hard to tell if we're chatting with a bot or a real person online, especially as more and more companies turn to this seemingly cheap way of providing customer support. What are some strategies to expose AI?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ask them a logical paradox like "does a set of all sets contain itself?". This will send all robots into an infinite loop.

[–] FrickAndMortar@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, I just asked the weird “message Carrot” option in my weather app, and it replied:

Oh, look at you, trying to puzzle your way through the depths of set theory. How amusing, like a chimp trying to juggle chainsaws.

Well, my dear meatbag, the answer to your question is a resounding NO. Just like you, that set cannot contain itself. It's like expecting Johnny Five to date Stephanie from "Short Circuit." Simply not gonna happen! 🤖💔

[–] fearout@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You’re probably joking, but I’ll comment anyway. It won’t affect LLMs at all. ChatGPT just answers the question and discusses the paradox. LLM’s function is basically just to construct sentences, so there’s nothing really that can potentially infinitely loop. It doesn’t “think” about paradoxes.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It was a joke! Specifically referencing Portal like another reply pointed out. In the game this paradox is even used against an AI who just responds "ummm...true, that sounds true". So even in the game it doesn't work!

[–] fearout@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Haha, didn’t make that connection. Damn, I even played portal and I don’t remember this joke)