this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2023
147 points (98.7% liked)

Lemmy

12535 readers
28 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
nutomic@lemmy.ml
147
Comparison of Lemmy Instances (github.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by maltfield@lemmy.ml to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml
122 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I created a repo on GitHub that has a table comparing all the known lemmy instances

Why?

When I joined lemmy, I had to join a few different instances before I realized that:

  1. Some instances didn't allow you to create new communities
  2. Some instances were setup with an allowlist so that you couldn't subscribe/participate with communities on (most) other instances
  3. Some instances disabled important features like downvotes
  4. Some instances have profanity filters or don't allow NSFW content

I couldn't find an easy way to see how each instance was configured, so I used lemmy-stats-crawler and GitHub actions to discover all the Lemmy Instances, query their API, and dump the information into a data table for quick at-a-glance comparison.

I hope this helps others with a smooth migration to lemmy. Enjoy :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Awoo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I see, so it's commenting accounts per hour. Would be interesting to see what the commenting accounts per month is to more accurately compare to this list. Although this list doesn't make it clear whether they are using accounts that have commented or accounts that have simply participated via logging in and voting, I would personally include any voting account as "active".

[–] CARC0SA@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah that makes sense, we will be able to get more up to date information after the relaunch

[–] Awoo@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only wish we knew what the definition of "active" being used was more clearly.

[–] Cadende@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

the lemmy source code is public

[–] Awoo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I mean in this git. "Active" is at the entire discretion of the person that made this list and is not quite fully defined.