Privacy

32092 readers

436 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

2124

Google engineers want to introduce DRMs for web pages, making ad-blocking near-impossible in the browser (github.com)

submitted 1 year ago by BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

865 comments fedilink hide all child comments

And since you won't be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility.

The community feedback is... interesting to say the least.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Kir@feddit.it -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but isn't Firefox itself basically paid by Google? I can't see it as a threat to Google full control of the web

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Google is their biggest donor. They pay $$$ to be the default search engine in Firefox.

But Microsoft would happily give a not-insignificant amount to have Bing be the default search engine, and everyone knows it.

It's a symbiotic relationship. Google sorta need to pay up. Firefox needs the funding.

Google does not control the running of Firefox.

[–] Kir@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you rely on Google donation in order to survive, at the end of the day you are under some sort of control. I'm not saying that Google is running Firefox directly, of course, but if Firefox would grow enough to became a problematic competitor for Chrome, they would definitively have the power to step in. So, how really free can they be?

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

Mozilla's definitely aware of this, but since all the competitors' browsers are free it's hard to make inroads on other means of profit.

[–] ky56@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

I thought Google funding Firefox was the cheapest way to fend off an antitrust issue?