this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
55 points (96.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43948 readers
644 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean, people use dash-cams protect themselves in case of a car crash, so do you think people in the future would also use body-cams protect themselves in case of being involved in a fight?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] zephyrvs@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

After the backlash that was created by Google Glass and the clusterfucks that other hip consumer-oriented wearable cameras (like Snap's Spectacles, Ray Ban's and Bose's glasses) have been, I don't expect this to happen.

It's much more likely that CCTV will be so pervavise that we're unlikely to have any expectation of privacy whatsoever, once in public and that governments and the private sector will have access to most of it.

[โ€“] Scew@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If they don't already. Probably more of to what degree at this point.

[โ€“] manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech 1 points 1 year ago

problem is trusting those sources.