zazo

joined 1 year ago
[–] zazo@lemmy.world -2 points 5 days ago

I mean the whole 1972 rape fantasy essay he wrote was potentially progressive at the the time but feels quite tone-deaf and ham fisted nowadays..

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Ah yes, the holy father trump goes to heaven by molesting children - how can we religious heathens bask in the same glory if our morals and care for other people prevent us from doing the same 😢

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

"Women are you still not sure if you want to be a woman" egg_irl much..

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

look folks, it's the high credibility left of center genocide newspaper!

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Interesting - as the article notes the first amendment was specifically implemented to protect unpopular view points - which is tricky because it does mean that white supremacists have the same right to voice their ideas as critical race theorists - but how do we balance that hate speech should have the same footing as voicing concerns around oppression?

even more so when those that are oppressed will have a harder time of being heard in the first place? should the law (as the 1st amendment specifically says that a view not held by society is still protected) tolerate hate and bigotry? it appears the nazi bar is guarded by the first amendment :/

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Under MMT taxation is just a tool to reduce inflation - why not introduce a yearly maximum income and collect everything else above as tax to manage inflation?

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Slorpo you say it and see how people react... What's right wingers obsession with slurs anyways?

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

damn finally got rid of that yee-yee ass haircut - and the ginger dude is also looking fresh

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So people can just downvote it instead right? That's literal direct democracy at play - if there's more people that like the bot they'll upvote it and it will have a positive score - saying "just bury your head in the sand if you don't agree with this message" is the reason we're in this political mess in the first place..

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Which is why the bot is not useful - it literally tries to standardize political stances when that's actually impossible.

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Same reason I don't trust it - imagine rating fking BBC (the literal pro-state violence, austerity supporting, anti-immigration governmental mouth piece as "left-center")

It just distorts people's perception of what political biases are and makes them complacent by relying on an automated bot to do the important work of using your own judgment for what constitutes as moral or justified.

By letting it platform itself on lemmy, it's basically inserting itself as the de facto expert on the topic - so for example, people overseas might see BBC rated as left-center and highly factual and start believing that wanting to "secure your borders" is a thing that UK leftist want. Well excuse me if I don't want a privately owned (even if open source) US company deciding what political views others should have.

[–] zazo@lemmy.world 103 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Being grateful is pretty neat but make sure to reciprocate! - "Suck her clit every morning to thank her for choosing you" 🥰

 
view more: next ›