If the water is cooled with a low-energy method like a Peltier cooler, the heat has to go somewhere.
yannic
joined 1 year ago
My limited experience with Agile is being forced to share the stage with half-hour soliloquies every morning**, so as long as the dev team doesn't have to deal with poorly-managed scrums, I'm all for it.
** I made a failed attempt at reminding everyone that it's called a 'standing meeting' partly because we're supposed to stand for its entirety. If the average person is overcome by the urge to sit down, then the _weak_ly-chaired meeting has been going on for way too long.
Edit: Instead of chair, I meant 'scrum master'
Locking issues? News to me! I have a problem with the database migration pausing during the "[INF] Applying migration 'MigrateRatingLevels'" step and while googling the issue, I haven't seen enough chastising, myself.
As a precaution, I changed my CIFS mount to NFS to no avail. I'm on the cusp of doing all the necessary prep-work to officially submit an issue to GitHub.
Probably tangentially related to June 4, 1989.
Comfortable doesn't even come close to describing it. My parents had a loaner once, and it made me regret buying "just" a Camry when I was Corolla-shopping. That car was a dream.
I thought they spoiled the punchline a bit too much by using the word "bar" to describe tanks of compressed gas.
It's a project by an Australian team, so one would assume two things:
- It's in Australian Dollars.
- Australia has experienced severe hyperinflation overnight (or earlier today, for many of us reading this)
Missing: Interior Semiotics
This was definitely an unnecessarily gendered post. My wife's secondary function is transforming food into heat energy.
They share a brand for mutual benefit. As far as I'm concerned, they can take the Electrolux and pyrex route and share the mutual pain of the other side being overly capitalist.
Haier & GE in the US can rebrand if they don't like the attention.
I'm trying to remember which company it was that sued their foreign trademark licensee because the partner chose to use inferior parts. The argument they used was that the partner damaged the global brand. It might not be relevant if the licensor is the one that's messing up here.
They're different, but not opposite. It's like comparing height and colour.