xapr

joined 1 year ago
[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Thank you. So the advantage of the isolation of LXC for you is to be able to tinker with the service without affecting the host.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From my understanding, the reason for this is to give candidates with less funds and less name recognition an opportunity to bubble up. Imagine that if the primary consisted of all states at the same time, candidates would need to campaign nationally, or only in the most populous states, either of which would cost tons of money. This would make it so that only candidates already starting off with massive campaign funds would have any chance.

One possible alternative approach would be to start with the smallest states (either by population or by area), one at a time, and ramp up to multiple largest states at the end of the primary cycle. This would give candidates a viable way to ramp up their campaign funds and name recognition. The only problem with this approach would be that the smallest states tend to be very white, so perhaps some adjustments would need to be made to make it more representative of the demographics of the country as a whole from the beginning.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ooof, I hadn't even thought about this possibility! They could splice up some absolutely wild ads of Trump surrogates appearing to criticize Trump for being too old and senile!

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, sorry you don't see it, but 2020 was as bad as, if not worse than 2016 for the dirty tricks against Bernie. Sorry, but for all the candidates who were contending for the same voters as Biden to drop out at once, but the one candidate who was contending for the same voters as Bernie not dropping out for the the same reason (they couldn't win) stunk to high heaven. That wasn't "just politics" any more than the Superdelegates were in 2016. Both were pure, undemocratic manipulation.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago

True story: I bought my current printer from a homeless man. I had actually found the printer in a box that someone had left on the curb across the street the night before, so I knew it wasn't stolen. I was going to take it home but was walking away from home at the time and didn't get a chance that night. The next day I saw it with the homeless man across the street and offered to buy it.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I agree with pretty much everything you've written. The only point I would like to make is that the section where the UFOs sits is the "We Have Questions" section, which is between the "Things That Actually Happened" and "Unequivocally False But Mostly Harmless" sections. I interpret this section as containing things that cannot (as of 2021) be conclusively shown to be true or false. Also note that they're not even saying ET UFOs, but just UFOs. I think the flying saucer is just for visual flair. If I recall correctly, the person who designed this is/was an actual graphic designer.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Here's another good one: The city of Long Beach, California spends close to that much every year to do the same thing to protect mansions built on a sand bar (the Long Beach Peninsula) that are about 50 feet from the water line on a good day. They just keep constantly moving sand from one end of the beach to the other end a couple miles away. That's city money. The article below has some details, but only refers to the city saving $100k to $300k a year by bringing the work in house. The figure I've heard is more like $500k a year. I imagine it's actually higher than that, even. They have dedicated big earth movers, a built facility to store and maintain them, employees dedicated to it, etc. Do the math. This is probably happening all over the country and all over the world.

https://www.presstelegram.com/2022/12/19/long-beach-moves-its-own-beach-sand-to-protect-peninsula/

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

Relevant Chart (open image in new tab to see it larger):

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

Ah, interesting, I didn't realize that this stuff had been around so long!

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago

I'm sorry to hear that. I recognize that any general statements meant for a "majority" audience can appear to be insensitive to those outside that "majority". That was not my intention and I regret that it appeared to be so.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I didn’t say it was a rule or commandment. The point is that natural food ingredients > processed, mystery ingredients for health (as a general rule, not always).

Also, an extreme low carb diet is not necessary to avoid diabetes, for most people.

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 6 months ago

The point is that natural food ingredients > processed, mystery ingredients for health (as a general rule).

I didn't say it was a rule or commandment. The point is that natural food ingredients > processed, mystery ingredients for health (as a general rule, not always).

view more: ‹ prev next ›