vcmj

joined 1 year ago
[–] vcmj@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago

It would be luck based for pure LLMs, but now I wonder if the models that can use Python notebooks might be able to code a script to count it. Like its actually possible for an AI to get this answer consistently correct these days.

[–] vcmj@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Godot does have a special thing for mesh instancing, I think variations were possible as well like different colored triangles maybe? https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/tutorials/performance/vertex_animation/animating_thousands_of_fish.html

[–] vcmj@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The way I understand the users didn't necessarily realize McAfee is responsible, just that a bunch of sqlite files appeared in temp so they might not connect the dots here anyway. Or even know McAfee is installed considering their shady practices.

[–] vcmj@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

I do think we're machines, I said so previously, I don't think there is much more to it than physical attributes, but those attributes let us have this discussion. Remarkable in its own right, I don't see why it needs to be more, but again, all personal opinion.

[–] vcmj@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I read this question a couple times, initially assuming bad faith, even considered ignoring it. The ability to change, would be my answer. I don't know what you actually mean.

[–] vcmj@programming.dev 6 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Personally my threshold for intelligence versus consciousness is determinism(not in the physics sense... That's a whole other kettle of fish). Id consider all "thinking things" as machines, but if a machine responds to input in always the same way, then it is non-sentient, where if it incurs an irreversible change on receiving any input that can affect it's future responses, then it has potential for sentience. LLMs can do continuous learning for sure which may give the impression of sentience(whispers which we are longing to find and want to believe, as you say), but the actual machine you interact with is frozen, hence it is purely an artifact of sentience. I consider books and other works in the same category.

I'm still working on this definition, again just a personal viewpoint.

[–] vcmj@programming.dev 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[–] vcmj@programming.dev 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"There are only two kinds of languages: the ones people complain about and the ones nobody uses" - Bjarne Stroustrup

[–] vcmj@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago

Not an answer to the question, but in case performance is the goal, Torchaudio has it here

[–] vcmj@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Yes, forgot the exact details apologies

[–] vcmj@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago

You can change those to /dev/disk/by-uuid/XYZ ("ls -an" that directory to see the symlinks to your current drives)

[–] vcmj@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Basically just look for things like root=/dev/sda2 in the kernel command line. You can get it at runtime by running "cat /proc/cmdline" having /dev/sda etc in your fstab might also be a problem

view more: next ›