tmjaea

joined 1 year ago
[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Pop!_OS and I have a question for you to come over and get me a new one

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

In my area there is a dog which has been fed a vegan diet for almost ten years now. So they definitely can survive on it. Said is healthy.

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Cool story bro. Now calculate how many people do it like you claim to do.

And now go on caressing your animals to their death :)

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Those 28 people sent back are conflicted felons. All of them committed serious crimes (Schwerverbrechen)

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (20 children)

Found the Omni.

Let me eat my meat and don't let me know it causes suffering! I do not want to be aware of the consequences of my actions!

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It might be cheaper but that is a pure capitalistic point of view. And capitalism is what brought us to our worlds current state

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

But how can one consider natural gas? The whole point is to avoid getting more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere?!

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

What is your understanding based on?

Regarding production batteries might be more expensive, but they can be charged some thousand times without any additional cost

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nice, manufactured almost two years after first usage 🤯

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because canonical removed packages from apt to prevent users to install their apps from apt instead. Firefox for example.

Firefox from Apt is a link to a snap!

https://askubuntu.com/questions/1399383/how-to-install-firefox-as-a-traditional-deb-package-without-snap-in-ubuntu-22

This is some bullshit level activity that I do not want.

I moved away from Microsoft to not have to deal with such an annoyance. Now canonical is doing it to their users.

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Avoiding snaps on Ubuntu sadly is not an option anymore. Maybe go for pop!_os Instead of Ubuntu.

[–] tmjaea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The Martian

21
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by tmjaea@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

Hi,

I've got a network setup consisting of 3 proxmox servers of which two have a 10Gbe interface. All interfaces are RJ45 copper ports.

So far I've got two qnap switches with 2 10Gbe and 5 2.5Gbe portss. They are connected to each other via one of the 10Gbe ports, and one of the servers on the other one.

This setup is working flawlessly, iperf measurements show 9.4gbit/s in both directions.

Recently I tried to increase my network for future expansion and bought a trendnet switch with 5 10Gbe ports.

Weird problems occurred and as they were also described in some amazon reviews I returned the switch and bought another one, this time a 4port 10Gbe switch from ubiquity.

Again there are problems. This time one direction seems to be at 10gbit/s as expected while the other direction (between the same two servers) is limited to 1gbit/s. The connection to the third server shows the same problem (one direction 2.5gbit/s and the other one limited to 1gbit/s).

All wires are connected correctly and as there is no problem on the qnap switches I do believe that there is no hardware problem on the cable/NIC side.

However I'm not sure if this is this just bad luck or some deep network problem I don't understand.

Maybe someone has an idea?

view more: next ›