skuzz

joined 1 year ago
[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

5 years from now, things will go full circle and YouTube will be Channel 487 on Comcast cable as "YT" but it will be a documentary channel on how to cane rocking chairs.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

Hey now, Windows 11 is becoming the biggest piece of garbage operating system to ever exist. It obviously worked! /s

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

And, drumroll please, Apple and Facebook/Meta (and Google) share information back and forth about users due to long-standing agreements. Huzzah!

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You should see the shit ass comments they've been making around the flooding in Asheville, they've been doing exactly that.

So shitfunny, that over a few days' time, they can have the cognitive dissonance to go:

  • "Hey, see, God hates libs, check out Asheville LULULULULULUULLL"
  • "Hey, the government has a weather control machine that's sending a hurricane to Florida! DAMN LIBS!!!!"

Like, I don't even.

Edit: Woops, didn't see that @cm0002@lemmy.world already made 50% of my comment.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 month ago

I have beef maybe once or twice a month. Doing my part.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 43 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's shitfunny because this is a perfect opportunity for apps like this to play into Capitalism and succeed twentyfold.

Open up the app to everyone for free during the hurricane, remove that after hurricane. So many people will go:

  • "OMG this app is useful, I'm paying"
  • "OMG that company is so kind, I'm paying"
  • "OMG I didn't even know about this but people spread the word, I'm paying!"

So many opportunities for longer-term profits missed by idiocy.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

We know the best ways to suck, even our storms!

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

All -300,000 of them.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Does uhh.....Cuba have a big Internet hacker infrastructure?

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 month ago

Hey now, we should salute McDonalds for keeping Big Beef in check. Those prices trickle down to us! /s

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hey, let's go one better. Let's require manufacturers to design product containers that don't waste product. I genuinely want to write a letter to whatever government organization oversees this type of stuff (in the US) at some point once I can figure out where, who, and gather documentation.

I'm talking everything. Salsa containers with a lip at the top that keeps all product from pouring out. Thin-necked mayo, tomato sauce, alfredo, etc. food containers that make even using a spatula and beatings difficult.

Then, lets move onto other things like bodywash, household cleaners, even the poop sprays. Airwick's poop spray is a good example. When the package is half-empty, tilting it to spray will pull the hose out of the liquid unless you rotate the container to resubmerge it. You can't even get half the product out before it is troublesome. Its whole life will be spent tilted at a 90 degree angle to spray in a toilet bowl. Why even use a hose? Oh, wait...for the profits.

More minor things, Bodywashes like Suave that switched from squeeze bottles to pumps. Most hand soaps also end up here too. The container is shaped with a dome in the bottom for structural reinforcement and the hose touches the reinforcement instead of extending all the way down to the bottom. Or every lotion bottle ever made.

Net sum, you end up with a few ounces of product that can't be used. Most people probably just chuck it and buy a new one. Just to spite them I try to use up every last drop of whatever, but it is an annoying effort every time.

The manufacturer doesn't care because the product being sold is the least expense of the entire supply chain, but think of the supply chain...

Let's talk body lotion and estimate 4oz of unused product in every lotion bottle (probably closer to 6, but even 1 adds up) and a 16oz lotion bottle.

I used AI to scrape the web for some numbers, so huge grain of salt here, but, it estimates a 40 foot cargo container and a packaging efficiency of 80%, that 37,000 bottles of 16oz lotion could fit in one container.

That's 148,000oz (1156.25 gallons, 4376.9 liters) of unused product being pointlessly shipped around per cargo container, with intent that it will be thrown away, per container. That is fuel in ships, trucks, aircraft, trains, delivery vans, peoples' cars all being burned to transport something that will never be used.

Multiply that by every kind of product line that does the same thing, it's a boondoggle of energy waste, pollution, CO2 generation, and customer ripoffery.

Mandatory changing of the design of packages for food, body, and other products could all by itself help with climate change on a planetary scale, as well as keeping the shrinkflaters more honest.

view more: ‹ prev next ›