We lost the election, but Biden was pretty demonstrably a lot better.
373
Woman told House Ethics panel she witnessed Gaetz having sex with minor, lawyer says
(abcnews.go.com)
21
Climate change terminology does not influence willingness to take climate action
(www.sciencedirect.com)
That was always the Rolling Stone business model — talk about the bands, and throw in a side of serious political news.
I wouldn't say that the movement towards state action weakened under Biden; we got some great examples of it, such as the requirement for renewables in Minnesota.
Sorry, but accelerationism only gets us a lasting fascism. It doesn't get us the kid of stable world where people can substitute wind and solar for fossil fuels
Probably six months before we see big auctions again.
They covered Project 2025 before the election, including the ties Trump's circle has to it.
This is generally not a great way to do it, since the emissions largely coming from fossil fuel burning. Fewer people doesn't help much if we burn even more.
In practice, those rules made it easier to have centrist primary challenges to Democrats in congress, rather than left-wing ones.
The big thing we need to change is the media environment. Much of the US is a news desert, so people are depending on things like YouTube shorts and Xitter for their news.
A whole bunch of Sanders supporters got themselves elected to the DNC and changed the rules to make contested primaries easier. The Democratic party isn't some static thing that we have no control over.
It's a lot easier to reshape a political party than to dump them and start afresh.
This one has a link to https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/nov/08/climate-breakdown-will-hit-global-growth-by-a-third-say-central-banks
Maybe a client issue on your end?
Or are you subscribing via mastodon instead of lemmy?