65% down from the 300 mil that Fidelity put into the acquisition. This article isn't about the overall value, just one investors valuation of their investment.
ryeonwheat
joined 1 year ago
Yeah, but the it's a good rule anyway, for some of the same reasons as the "Don't put it in an email if you wouldn't want it read aloud in a deposition" rule.
Aren't they? Changing a legacy app can take years to do the needed research, approval, procurement, and implementation. "Because my IT guy doesn't like Windows" is a terrible reason to undergo that process.
The same with retraining users on a whole new OS. You'll spend hours over the course of months answering "where did my C:\ drive go?". That's a lot of time you'll never get back.
Active Directory provides a lot of tools that are familiar to senior techs and easy enough for junior techs to figure out. I might prefer how Salt Stack works but I don't have time to train dozens of fellow techs.
Linux is cool for a number of reasons, but it isn't a magic easy button and a wise admin doesn't swap out fundamental parts of his tech stack without careful consideration.
There's some great answers already here, but I want to add a detail fir some context. Like others mentioned, Let's Encrypt does just the bare minimum of verification. They aren't really verifying that you are who you say you are, they are verifying you control the website. The reason is due to their goal.
They want as many people as possible using a secure Web protocol, and that requires as many people as possible have a certificate for any websites they run. There is minimal verification of identity, but the benefit of encrypted communications and even that bare minimum id is a huge step up in consumer security from old unprotected protocols.
If they wait long enough, they might be trading their stake in X for a candy bar.