Disruptive technology doesn’t follow cost covering logic though. Covering costs is hardly interesting for investors. Netflix ran at loss to grow quickly and cement the market share.
Recent enshittification occurs because the market came to an understanding that the fight for the market share is over and now it’s time to satisfy investors.
But several things can be true at the same thing time. Infrastructure is expensive and investors want to maximize return of investment.
Ok?
Gibt es irgendwelche Ansprüche zu wissen ob eine KI Aussagen auswertet, die hinausgehen über die Ansprüche zu wissen, ob ein regelbasiertes System die Ansprüche auswertet?
People always underestimate the work power needed to keep automated things running. And even more to set them up in the first place.
Many things that look like fully automated still have people in the loop.
Wenn du jetzt noch den Namen nennst könnte man erahnen ob du damit eher die Gewalt erleidenden Frauen oder den Kommentator meinst.
Confused. So that’s a thing where you agree?
Or do you think that’s my position?
Or do you just post something to shut down calling outs of propaganda narratives?
As I said in the other comment, not falling for one sides propaganda doesn’t automatically mean the other side is right. What we have on social media is propaganda for a supposed Palestinian side, but overwhelmingly it’s Hamas’ talking points, which are clearly anti Israel, but lacking in the “pro Palestinian” cause.
Oh dear.
Distancing yourself from one propaganda side is all well and fine, but that doesn’t mean the other side is automatically in the right, you know?
And you are using the other side’s words and narratives, which frankly is their propaganda.
Pretty sure you could answer that yourself if you wanted to.
Oh yes. With that sort of thing better double check each time.
According to your statement there must be someone getting fucked. An trade where all parties are satisfied does not seem possible.