qaz

I personally didn't dislike NuGet that much, but that's coming from someone who has been working with CMake for the last couple of months 😄

TLDR: Rust, Go and other modern languages don't use more dependencies than C/C++, but have larger binaries due to including libraries into the executable binary. This trade-off was chosen to ensure you can reliably run the executable on various systems without dependency issues.

I personally have gone with both options on several occasions. Being able to include an HTTP client without having to debug someone's cURL installation is certainly worth a few extra MiB's of disk space. However, I've also used C instead of Rust to avoid a very simple CLI program turning into several MiB's large binary (due to statically including the Rust std lib).

Seagate Ironwolf "ST4000VN006"

I do have some issues with read speeds but that's probably networking related or due to using RAID5.

Why? It seems on topic to me

Why did you decide to go with Rakulang?

17W for an N100 system with 4 HDD's

According to EICAR's specification the antivirus detects the test file only if it starts with the 68-byte test string and is not more than 128 bytes long. As a result, antiviruses are not expected to raise an alarm on some other document containing the test string.

This won't work, assuming the database file is more than 128 bytes long

What do you do? (You don't need to be specific)

The choice is yours. Would you like to be the sickest law-abiding citizen, or the healthiest BioTerrorist?

It's a joke about the criticism systemd gets

Well, the post is literally called "bioterroism rule(s)", so it's not strange that they feel like you're implying that.

I was talking about branch names, not file names. File duplicates due to case sensitivity aren't a problem on Windows anyway because those are already enforced by the file system. Unless you have people working on Linux that have multiple files with a similar name but with different casing but those should know better.