pyska

joined 1 year ago
[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Edit: You are using the false dilemma wrongly. Here's an example of a false dilemma: "Well, we need to be happy. So, do you want consumerism? Or communism? There's no third option." We can still find ways to be happy in a bad system, whether or not we engage in politics.

Original reply: That's what I'm saying. How would you know the concept of "health" if being unhealthy wasn't a thing? Same thing with happiness.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can't have happiness without having sadness. In the same way, you couldn't have things get better if things couldn't get worse. They are two parts of the same coin. So enjoy the moment. Do not let some roadbumps throw you off the road. ;)

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Man, I hate question headlines. They entice you to click a link while promising an answer that may not come. You do get ads, though.

Wish we lived in a society were titles were like:

  • Is global warming a hoax? No.
  • Are you eating microplastics? Probably.
  • Did the president have unspoken relationships with a donkey? No proof, but you are free to speculate.

Edit: Nothing against OP. I'm just venting about this little thing.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They aren't real "rights", but they are real. You just defined them.

I don't mean to be hard headed. I feel like I agree with you since the beginning on the idea of it. I'm just stuck on the "isn't real" part of it.

Because I can very easily say "rights" aren't real as well. It's just pixels on a screen. :)

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, it's in there. The "rights" are part of a number of societal rules which depend on the "dance" (of life). In this case, the fighting for said rights and communicating that they exist are part of the "dance".

The rest of it I was describing life, because consequences matter where I live at least. And since it seemed "natural rights" were bound only by the consequences you are willing to take, then they are the same as life itself, which I thought was pretty funny.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I mean, life is as life is. Would you stop talking on the street if society decides that is a crime, or if that means you'll be discriminated against? Some people might, but you can't expect everyone to do it.

It's all a big dance and societal rules fluctuate depending on who's dancing. You just gotta dare live life (preferably in a good way).

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's ok, I hereby declare it is a natural right to face the consequences of your actions.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago

In all of life there is a balance.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If I watch a movie I'm constantly criticizing stuff. Like, "omg, pay the writers more, this sucks" or "No! You can't share the same keyboard at the same time! Argh!"... I feel like an old man xD

 

Learning implies change. To live implies change. Change is the only constant. Therefore, instead of fighting it, we should embrace it.

What experiences have you had with change?

I'll start:

As I've become more politically aware, I've become less and less willing to do hard work. I now do only what is asked of me, and no more. It started as a response to the inherent exploitation we are forced to participate, but it creeped into my own personal life. I have become "lazy", as I've become less and less engaged in my own personal projects. And while I tend to antagonize this part of myself, I've recently learned to be compassionate. I'm now slowly realizing how much I overworked myself, and how toxic my relationship to work was. I'm slowly enjoying life a bit more every day, and even though I feel like I'm going "slower", I no longer think that's necessarily a bad thing. It's ok to smell the roses sometimes.

There is still a sour feeling in me of how much more I would be willing to do if the result of such work benefited society directly. But I can't just will a different economic system into existence, so I need to learn to let go. We need to pick and choose our battles.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

After reading your comment I agree with you. I was being fat-phobic inadvertently.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Ah, I see. I tunnel-vision'd on that one comment. But ye, that's a fair point.

[–] pyska@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it OK to mock the femininity of a gay right winger? He could act straight with a “kick in the butt”

Then what did you mean by this question?

view more: next ›