phx

joined 1 year ago
[–] phx@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

What's the IR bottom heater for?

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And you got that from what?

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pretty much, unless he was planning to donate one of his existing illegitimate children to her.

"Hey, I've got a bunch extra of these and nobody's answered my sale ad on X, you should take one"

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

Strange, the words i think of are more like: "narcissistic" "obnoxious" & "asshole" with a side of "moron" thrown in

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago (7 children)

You get judged by the company you keep

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"She makes some good points. I might vote for her if she wasn't a Democrat" - Republicans

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Or a voting scam

"Hmm, it says here that Sir Barkinwoof IV is a registered Republican. If there is some discrepancy out must be the fault of the former owner"

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Outdoor temperature in °C, unless you're talking about an outdoor pool then it's often enough °F :-)

I think part of the reasons it's so mixed might just be due to how many Amero-centric devices and parts are common between the two countries.

Y'all can take your shitty Phillips screws though. Roberts is by far superior ;-)

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok, so when the police use a young-appearing officer to nail somebody who is looking to hook up with what is listed as a 14yo... that's just going to get dropped? Because it seems that's a tactic that's been used often enough and the actual age of the officer matters less than the intent of the perp to engage in sex with a minor.

The argument "I just thought we were role-playing" isn't significantly different from "I totally know this '14yo giving a BJ to old man.mp4' was AI generated and that's just my fetish, not real kids"

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

"sink Twitter and we'll give you some preferential deals"

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

And if that video built to feature a child performing fellario, it would still be child pornography

[–] phx@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 months ago (5 children)

When the "AI artwork" is made for the specific purpose of representing underage children and is indistinguishable from the real thing, that argument is going to get flattened pretty quickly.

Pretty easy to present a couple pages to a jury of kids pictures (not nude) and say "tell us which ones were AI".

view more: ‹ prev next ›