obviouspornalt

joined 1 year ago

He's got enormous... range as an actor.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He's extremely stupid and completely driven by his narcissism.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Market makers aren't idiots. They're not going to provide liquidity to allow someone to dump thousands of lots of this piece of shit listing on them.

The "adjust the price until they do" part is the piece of your comment that's relevant here.

That one was a slow burn, but once I got it... Chef's kiss

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

That's weird, cause the only words I associate with him are "bullshitter", "con man", "real estate swindler", "narcissist".

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

She's an unmarried cat lady.

And she's voting Harris / Waltz. As was foretold.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yes, let's spend money on a system that only helps people in a specific set of buildings only during specific parts of the day and year when the buildings are occupied, rather than doing anything that would help society at large, at all times and anywhere in the country.

Like I said, it's impossible to know what the right thing to do here, much less actually do it.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hmmm, one involves fleecing school district funding in a grift, the other reduces profits to armaments manufacturers.

I really can't figure this out! How is it possible to know?

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

"John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!"

https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worcester_v._Georgia

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I dont think they cut much, just one charge and most (all?) references to the Department of Justice. Indictment went from 46 down to 35 pages, still carries 6 charges. A new grand jury considered it and voted to indict. Nothing about this sequence of events indicates this is a weak case.

I personally wouldn't want a federal indictment of 36 pages against me.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 weeks ago

The rendering of a sentence as part of a just trial is absolutely a part of the law, not above the law.

The entire process is spelled out: prosecution, indictment, jury selection, trial, conviction, appeal, etc. fully within the confines of the law.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 1 month ago

It also lowers the number of transaction they have to do, which lowers costs a little.

view more: next ›