nonailsleft

joined 1 year ago
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Not 'harder'. Smarter, better and more consistently.

And yeah the US is the only country that never meddled in or abused other countries for economic gain, or benefitted from slavery in any way, so that's the only one in the world where workers' rights really count. Right

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Sure. Mass movement, politicians, pen, paper, law

Leave one of those out and it probably won't work

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Well, the US only enacted it in 1937

So I only have basically all of Europe off the top of my head

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Get wounded some more??

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Do you want cheap eggs or not

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago

Can we at least call it Super Genocide?

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -2 points 2 days ago

Can't call them idiots though

They just pulled the only lever they had

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago

They're bound for Paradise

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (15 children)

And do you think it was the bombers that wrote this into law, or elected politicians?

edit: and why did other countries manage to get it into law a lot faster than the US?

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (20 children)

I'm not talking about becoming a democracy, I'm talking about *improving *and modernizing their democracies. As well as, well, voting for and enacting all the policy examples you listed

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (22 children)

Most other countries got there by voting people into power that wrote and voted these principles into law. Voted for people that improved their democratic processes.

If you think it doesn't matter that you voted for the most capitalist candidate as long as you do a little Robin Hood shit on the side, you've seen too many movies and not enough history imo

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Me and a few others here are responding to people claiming that this attack "murdered an insane number of civilians", "killed a majority of civilians", "was like an anthrax attack" and so on.

I'm showing publicly available information and how that leads to me to conclude that the above statements go against all logic.

Now, if your final argument is that one can't really comment on any news from the Middle East because 'we can't know' then yeah, I guess I don't have any more rebuttal for that

view more: ‹ prev next ›