navorth

joined 1 year ago
[–] navorth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I never said I support cluster munitions. Fuck them, and fuck the Nazis.

I did not just engage in a few hours of discussion to try and convince anyone that Ukraine is the shining beacon of hope and democracy. It isn't, they have problems. So does every state. Some (like Russia) just seem to have comparatively more of those, or are not particularly good at dealing with them.

[–] navorth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I'd agree in a vacuum. Even though I'd prefer state owned stuff, quality of life does not depend solely on who owns the infrastructure.

Stuff we take for granted like buying food product at the deli (meat, cheese) required either being lucky, knowing the right people or having US dollars in your pocket.

[–] navorth@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I meant pre 2014 conflict though.

[–] navorth@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I live in eastern Europe, and I agree that the 90s and early 2000 sucked for us. Big time. My country government absolutely botched the transition to free market economy.

Still, I feel we traded stable but shit for volatile yet hopeful.

[–] navorth@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Disappointing. The other Hexbear folk at least tried to have a discussion, you just show up with the old 'everything right of me is fascist' argument, expecting what exactly?

[–] navorth@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

That's a good question. Let me tackle it from a different angle though - why do ex USSR/Warsaw Pact countries actively want to join NATO?

As a resident of one, I think it's because they feel that Russia after Yeltsin has the exact same imperialistic principles USSR did. And it doesn't matter to them that Russia did cooperate with the West, because they see those principles as enough threat. Thus, they have the same reason to fear Russia as Russia has to fear NATO.

Perhaps if NATO disbanded before 1999 we wouldn't have current Russia, but that's alt history.

[–] navorth@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Ethnic cleansings in those territories are a fabricated casus beli for Russia 'green man'. There were tensions between Russian and Ukrainian nationals in those territories, but I've seen no data on large scale extermination operations.

Ukraine engaged in a defensive war with a force clearly backed by their stronger neighbor that just laid claim to another piece of their land (Crimea). This was a land grab in all but name, no matter how much propaganda tries to paint it as a legitimate independence movement. Blame for casualties of that war lies entirely on separatists and Russia.

[–] navorth@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Ok, I will not be defending those actions of NATO - I protested against my country involvement when possible and do agree about them being either dumb decisions (Kosovo) or straight up war crimes (Afghanistan). They shouldn't have happend.

My point still stand though. NATO doesn't threaten Russia borders. It could be called 'Anti-Russia-Country-Club', but even then the only things threatened by existence of NATO are post-USSR legacy and economic interest. Not exactly arguments to mount a large scale invasion/ethnic cleansing.

[–] navorth@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah yeah, I know Hexbear. I don't agree with their pro-imperialism, but at the same time they are not wrong with their socialist takes.

That's why it's worth debating them - they are not inherently evil like fascists are.

[–] navorth@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (35 children)

You can't write two paragraphs excusing Russia and then say "I'm not excusing Russia btw."

No country should be able to force 'my way or a military invasion' ultimatum on another non hostile sovereign state. If a government interprets a neighboring country joining a purely defensive treaty out of their own volition (no, Ukraine is not secretly run by the CIA after Maidan) as a hostile act, that only means the nationalism levels went out if control.

I'm normally very critical of the US, but neither them nor NATO can be blamed for this conflict.

[–] navorth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

On a surface level, yes. The initial proposal (I'm not sure how the final version looks like) gave the commission an ability to ban someone from participating in politics without a trial or evidence.

Done by the current government, this will be a giant smear campaign against the opposition.

[–] navorth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

A bit late to the party, but I agree with the post. Once the community grows to the point where every update has some discussion, we can start the bot updates.

In the meantime, perhaps we can create a standardized 'New Release' post template? Something people can just quickly plug the series and chapter info into, and provide a link.

view more: next ›