myfavouritename

That's a great point. I suppose one could tell how healthy the relationship is between developer and publisher by looking at how many dev companies on the roster have created a second great game. Of course, that's tough even with a great publisher, so maybe that's not realistic.

Wow. I've always trusted games published by Annapurna to be something exciting, new, and high quality. I'm devastated to hear that this publishing company is floundering.

I found a technique that worked well for me. I want to share with you and others, but I don't want to come across as judging you in anyway. It's hard to find great candidates of any sort. And I wouldn't necessarily recommend my technique to every company, because it's just not reasonable in all cases.

I've found that the best way to get a good mix of people hired onto the team is to do more than hope that it happens.

I had to get out to workshops, conferences, and meetups. Local universities had groups that I got in touch with. I had to make connections with the communities that I was looking to hire from. It was a lot of hard work.

But once you've developed those connections, candidates roll in with surprising regularity for a long time. After two years I had a team of 10 great devs with a 50/50 split between genders and a huge range of background and cultures. It was the most fun team to work with and we made awesome stuff.

I play a lot of board games. And I own a lot of board games. Not all of my games get played very much, so I like to track each play and over time see which games are forgotten gems or which games I'd be best to just trade away.

In the board game community, you might come across people talking about the "Friendless" metric of their collection. It's a totally made up measurement, invented by a person with the user name Friendless. In that way, it's like the Elo rating in chess and other games. I find it's useful to know when I'm "done" with something that doesn't really have an end, like playing board games. You can always play one more game.

Friendless hypothesized that if you play a game 10 times, you've gained 90% of its remaining utility. So after 10 plays, you consumed 90% of the game play that game provides. After another 10 plays, you're at 99%. By the time you reach 30 plays, you've consumed 99.9% of the game.

You can do the same with games. Maybe the number of plays changes a bit. Maybe it's not the number of plays, but the number of hours. I would say that games of Civ are like games of any other board game: 10 = 90% utility gained. Matches in COD, probably not the same.

This is a really interesting article. Thank you!

I'll totally agree that the author did not do a great job of stating their thesis plainly. However, I think that the article isn't incoherent. The author is writing about why they are surprised and disappointed that France and the Olympics gave Tom Cruise a global spotlight. They claim he's too much in bed with Scientology to make supporting him possible without supporting them. And they claim that France and french media should know better than to support Scientology.

I think it's a reasonable objection and I'm glad someone is objecting. Although, again, I agree that the article could have benefited from having that thesis clearly written from the start.

Gonna piggy back on your comment to agree with OP. I get such joy from reading Becky Chambers!

Right?! So excited for season Two and so excited that we'll get to see a proper (planned) ending to the series instead of a slow fading away before cancellation.

That is an amazing acronym and I wish to see it everywhere!

Thank you for this! Lots of people online have pushed forward the idea that Google search results are not as useful as before. This was the first article that I've read that did a good job of quantifying what that actually means and providing context as to why it is happening.

Thanks for this! I had no idea about the history of the game.

Damn. I had forgotten what actual journalism looks like. There was actual work done here to investigate and acquire facts. I've been reading "articles" that are just paraphrased PR statements for so long. This was a breath of fresh air.