mwguy

joined 1 year ago
[–] mwguy@infosec.pub -1 points 16 hours ago

Ya force them to use unguided artillery shells! /s

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Come and join me in Firefox and try out container tabs. Super powerful when you're trying to keep home and work identities seperate.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is NOSTR any good? I've heard a bit about it but I haven't gotten my feet wet yet.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

Your war. The people you support, Hamas, started it.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Honestly I hope you look at it now and shatter. This support for Hamas (both fiscal and moral) coming from people like you is the #1 thing preventing the rise of a legitimate, independent Palestinian state. And the #1 empowering the poverty of the Palestinian population in the West Bank and Gaza.

When we in the West defacto tell Gazans, "Kill them Jews we got your back, we'll help you rebuild, we'll pressure them to allow themselves to be enslaved. You've got it so bad; it can never get worse." We're giving Gazans a false sense of security. If Gazans were black they would never receive this level of foreign support. If they weren't attempting tourser Jews, they'd never have this level of support.

According to the UN there are 195 countries in the world, including Palestine. 194 of them receive less per capita aid and commit less per capita terrorism. Gaza could easily become the Madagascar or Haiti or Chad in 6 months and be 1000x worse off than they are today.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm arguing for a Hamas surrender. Don't know if you realized but there's a war on. What your mistaking for a genocide, is a war. A war the side you seem to support started. And a war they can end tomorrow with a surrender.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 0 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I don’t “hear out” the reasons a Nazi has for justifying genocide. Do you?

Dude dunking on Nazi's is sort of what I do.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh yeah, the Other debunked tunnel propaganda .

That article doesn't debunk it. It simultaneously says the proof of the tunnels under the hospital is unconvincing and then says "but Israel build basement rooms in the 1980s so it doesn't count."

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Also, let's not forget the hilariously bad video they put out as """proof""" from months before.

"They" in this case was a random Twitter account chasing clout.

The IDF invited NBC and other news organizations to tour the tunnels they found. Along with a bunch of other proof of their usage.

Maybe the problem is that you look at random Twitter accounts chasing clout as legitimate sources. There's a ton of these clout fiends talking shit on both sides sharing false or doctored video.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 0 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

I ain't even reading it.

Everything you need to know about your position.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago

The goal should be to use whatever is most effective and efficient for yourself,

And if taught as they should be, that will be the keyboard.

Counting out 5*5 on your fingers works and might be the fastest way you've been taught to multiply, but that doesn't mean we should excuse schools not teaching times tables and how to use a caluclator.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 6 points 3 weeks ago

It works well for casual conversation. But if you're trying to have a technical conversation it will fail on uncommon or custom words or phrases.

 

Title is hyperbole. Essentially the answer is maybe but most likely not. Has a discussion about potential poll error in the context of precision vs. accuracy. Notes that the model assumes accuracy but not precision.

 

AI Generated Summary (I've been expirimentign with it):

  • Kamala Harris had a tough day in the forecast despite gains in national polls.
  • She leads by 3.8 points nationally but has a 47.3% chance of winning the Electoral College.
  • The model adjusts for convention bounce, assuming her polls are inflated.
  • Harris’s numbers may improve if she maintains her current standing.
  • A concern is the lack of polls showing her ahead in Pennsylvania, a key state.
  • Recent polls show Pennsylvania as a tie or slightly favoring Trump.
  • Harris has a 17% chance of winning the popular vote but losing the Electoral College.
  • RFK’s dropout and endorsement of Trump may impact her in Rust Belt states.
  • Tim Walz has had a strong rollout as Harris’s VP, but there’s speculation about Josh Shapiro.
view more: next ›