mozz
(From memory, so there might be tiny mistakes in the language:)
"If we could climb the highest steeple
and then look down on all the people,
and shoot the ones not wholly good,
as we, like noble shooters, should,
Why then there'd be an only worry:
Who'd be left to bury
Us?"
-Walt Kelly
Sounds like it'd work great. You might want to use something like DigitalOcean instead of your home machine, for a couple different reasons. DigitalOcean is cheap for this type of application (like on the order of, IDK, $5-10 a month or something).
Also, fair warning, the current generation of Fediverse software is a pain in the ass to install, even before you get into issues of upgrading it, staying on top of security of the server, etc etc. But sure, it's doable if you're savvy and willing to invest some small time into it.
You just blew my mind.
I kept wondering why semi-literate politicians with fully-illiterate supporters would write books at all... who is the target audience? What makes it worth the trouble? Like I don't agree with their priorities but I see them as perfectly effective at what they're trying to do; why are they doing this weird thing? Why can I buy a book Matt Gaetz "wrote," hardcover, on Amazon for $10?
This makes it make sense.
I mean, it's working for her so far. What else is she qualified to make six figures at, let alone while not having to behave professionally or do any work?
If she believed in hell, I think she'd have some reservations, but as it is I think she's probably pleased as punch about the result.
"No business which depends for existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to continue in this country." -FDR
Also:
Che wants to see California legislators change their approach towards entrepreneurship.
"Make that path easier. Make it less expensive, make it more simple, streamline it. Instead of putting roadblocks in front of it, open it up. Guide people," Che said.
Do we think this guy got a bunch of free money from the government during COVID?
Oh look, he did. Not that there's anything wrong with that, it was a good program and good to make use of it. But, his whole attitude during the article of complaining about how difficult it's going to be to figure out how to use it in such a way where he won't have to pay it back really smacks of "I have never worked in a dishroom or behind a register even a single day of my life."
Be grateful. You fuck. Just like you should be grateful that our economic system gives you a little squad of people to run your business day-to-day for you and you get to keep the profits, instead of complaining that all of a sudden you won't be able to have them do it exactly the way you want them to, whether or not it can economically produce a living wage for them. With lunch for the fancy people and all. You fuck.
I don't think she cares what the actual policy is. The point is, she gets to make noise about the right's well-trodden favorite topic. What's actually going on is of no concern.
TL;DR: "Doe 537" or whatever has been identified as some person you've never heard of, and it's unclear whether that means they were guilty of anything. Also Bill Clinton is in there, although it's also not clear if he was guilty. The only actual indication of wrongdoing by anyone in this fairly long article is here, which I will include with some level of sadness but without comment:
Alan Dershowitz has sought to get numerous filings unsealed, arguing they would disprove Giuffre's misconduct accusations against him as well (the two settled a large number of lawsuits and counter-lawsuits against each other and their lawyers in 2022, with Giuffre stating she "may have made a mistake" saying Epstein trafficked her to Dershowitz).
I nominate "stating she 'may have made a mistake'" as this year's six Hemingway words that by themselves communicate the whole goddamned story from beginning to end.