modifier

Naïve article overall. Writers should know better than to prognosticate on what could actually hurt Trump's chances. But this is a fantastic line:

That was clear early on when Tony Hinchcliffe, a man invited by Trump to give one of the introductory speeches—who in true MAGA fashion alleged without providing a shred of evidence that he was a comedian

They literally just did with a very high degree of precision, you butterknife.

Its better to be the incumbent party for sure but there are still manifold threat modes.

Yeah you can just remove the outer boundary of suckage in that case.

I am just accepting the fact that the entire period between election day and inauguration is going to suck very, very badly if Harris wins.

Directly into my veins please.

Completely true.

I laughed but...

I hope we are able to reclaim our basic humanity if we survive this attack on the fabric of our society.

The Post's opinion section today. I canceled my subscription yesterday but still have access until June.

It is their right and it's our right, if not duty, to call them out for exercising their right to the extreme detriment of the very constitution that grants them that right.

Concern-trolling aside, you accidentally make a good point about inequity of expectations for the two candidates.

Being associated with a pedophile rapist should be disqualifying for anyone running for president.

Trump has a known association with a pedophile rapist and is indeed himself an adjudicated rapist, meanwhile I winced hard reading at the end of this article that Beyonce has previously gifted Kamala tickets to see her back in 2023.

There isn't actually anything wrong with that, but the bar for impropiety for Harris is so low it's a constant tripping hazard, while impropiety is just accepted as a burned in part of Trump's big businessman personality.

Its fucking insane and I appreciate you inadvertently highlighting it.

Treasonous dipshit is his new name effective immediately.