loren

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] loren@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Which languages with a full runtime and memory management are in the same ballpark? Go, maybe? Obviously these are unimpressive figures for unmanaged languages.

[–] loren@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think calling it an emulation downplays podman. Docker and podman are both container runtimes. Docker came first and is known synonymously with containers, whereas podman is newer and attempts to fix docker's problems.

One outcome of this is podman chose to match docker's cli very closely so nobody needs to learn a new cli. You can even put podman on the docker socket so "docker [command]" runs with podman.

[–] loren@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 year ago (20 children)

If you expected someone's fledgling project that's just getting started to be as polished and refined as something that's had thousands of dev hours over the last 5-10 years then that's just bad expectations management. It will get better.

[–] loren@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (14 children)

All the major languages for web backends are memory safe. Java, C#, etc

[–] loren@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Buried at the bottom of the article is a link to this github issue that explains VS Code's policy, which is apparently to make beta-quality APIs available to one or two extensions first to get feedback, then make it publicly available later. The extension author gets access to the API early but accepts that it's non-final and subject to changes or breakages. This appears to be what happened with InlineCompletionProvider which is one of the APIs Codeium complains about.

Sure, it's very convenient for Microsoft to give early access to another Microsoft product but it's not the worst policy ever to get feedback before everyone in the world starts developing against API and it becomes harder to fix design problems.

I wonder if Codeium has requested their extension to be selected for this status.