lledrtx

joined 11 months ago
[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Coincidentally I'm on a train too and the whole train car is complaining about me furiously masturbating at the picture.

 
[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

WDYM? Common Vietnamese W

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Okay, I don't have a lot of confidence in this, but I assume the average American is actually pro-Israel? At least the swing "independent" voters?

Like I know young people are pro-Palestine but those people probably wouldn't vote for Trump in any case and probably live in strongly blue states?

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How is that even possible good lord? 5000 pages?

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't know what you are even arguing. My point is India is democratic and secular despite being flawed. Do you not agree with that? If you don't agree with that, why are you worried about the word "secular" being removed? How does it matter anyway?

Your incident counting means nothing - India has 1.4B people. Obviously you can find more cases LMAO.

My point is India is democratic and secular - and that's an achievement in South Asia (that's why compared to Pakistan). And that has made it more developed. So democracy and secularism are good ideals to fight for.

If India is not better off than Pakistan and Bangladesh, might as well let BJP make it non secular like them? Why bother fighting it?

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Right, so went from "no persecution" to "police addressed it". Cool cool. Can you point me to perpetrators of the genocide being punished?

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

no refugees

Not true - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigration_to_India

fall to the Hindu majority who would nationilze around their identity and oppress everyone else which is exactly what happend

It's not even close to that. For sure there needs to be big improvements in minority rights but it's not even close to what Pakistan (and Bangladesh) are. India is heavily flawed but still has a functional democracy and secular state while not a single PM in Pakistan has completed a full term. Lol like they are not even comparable. If anything, India is an achievement of secularism and a good example of why you should separate the church and state.

just gives credit for Pakistan's purpose

Now that is a circular argument because the nationalists say "look at Pakistan and Bangladesh, Muslims got that, why aren't we getting one?". So creation of Pakistan is what gives credit to their argument.

For its purpose of avoiding being an oppressed minority, it succeded.

Did they? Do Pakistani Muslims lead better life than Indian Muslims?

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (3 children)

aren't facing any persecution

Except the genocide, lynching etc. am I right? LMAO

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (11 children)

How exactly?

They claim that they are doing this to help non-muslim refugees fleeing places like Pakistan. Their claim is that they can't accommodate all refugees so the first preference is for non-muslims being persecuted.

If Pakistan didn't exist, this persecution wouldn't be there?

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand why this comment is inevitably under every Tiktok thread. Everyone knows Big Tech spies for the govt especially the lawmakers, precisely why they don't want a hostile foreign govt doing it.

China knows this too - that's why FB, Google etc are banned there. So what's your point?

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Nah. Short penis privilege 😎

[–] lledrtx@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I sit on the toilet to pee at home. Why do all guys just not do that? It's better in every way.

 
view more: next ›