junbird

joined 2 years ago
[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@yogthos I remember watching this video in awe when I was youger. Always wanted to try this myself, but I could not find the necessary resources.

[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@yogthos This seems extremely interesting, thank you for sharing!

[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@yogthos A few more years and we'll actually get minecraft running inside minecraft. Really hyped about that 🔥

[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

@jackalope @pingveno I think that Friendica's UI was literally inspired by early Facebook's. It's not slick, but it has its charm, it's kind of nostalgic.

[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@SrEstegosaurio A bit OT, but what's not to like about Matrix? I'm curious as I was seriously considering to try it out.

[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

@nom_nom Btw, here's a good article on the Fediverse https://axbom.com/fediverse/
It also explains that the Fediverse isn't really made of just one protocol: ActivityPub is the most popular one by far (mainly thanks to Mastodon, which has been widely adopted), but there are also a few others (the most notable one is Matrix, which allows private and decentralized instant messaging).

[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@nom_nom That's basically it. There are many kinds of AP servers floating around, and while most of them overlap quite a bit (what the Fediverse is mostly about is microblogging), there's also stuff like ForgeFed, which is an extension to the protocol that will eventually allow Gitea (a Github alternative) instances and similiar Forge servers to federate with each other. Of course, you won't be able to commit code through Mastodon, but you might be able to comment existing issues on a project.

[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

@nom_nom Different servers realize different services, or at the very least they realize them in different ways. What's new is that these services are at least somewhat interoperable with each other: I can comment on this Lemmy thread via Mastodon, altough I cannot start threads in a Lemmy community. Other AP servers work much better with Lemmy. For example, Friendica (a Facebook clone) allows for the publishing of posts in groups (which is what Lemmy communities basically are).

[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

@nom_nom They both comply to the ActivityPub protocol, but they do very different things, as one is a microblogging platform while the other is basically an image board. You could say that what's different about them is simply their front-ends, but that wouldn't be correct, as each AP server allows their users to do different things. For example, you cannot publish standalone posts in communities (or groups) via Mastodon, while Lemmy doesn't let you publish posts without specifying a community.

[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

@garret @Tiuku It's what is hosting both of your profiles, and mine too. It's a server which complies to the ActivityPub protocol https://www.w3.org/TR/activitypub/
This is the standard that powers the Fediverse, allowing servers and their users to speak to each other. Mastodon, Lemmy and so on implement it so that they can easily interoperate. The SW that OP linked to is simply another implementation of this protocol

[–] junbird@livellosegreto.it 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@Sal @imgprojts I've been wondering the same thing for a while, as apparently that's also the reason for Mastodon (and others too, I guess) not allowing users to search for posts if not by hashtag. I can't really figure out what's the problem that this decision aims to solve.

view more: next ›