I've never played Starfield, but I haven't had issues with Elder Scrolls mods on Proton. If the Nexus Mods app doesn't work, you can just download the individual mods from their website, which I prefer anyway.
ipacialsection
joined 1 year ago
Debian's preinstalled software on some desktops is one of my main problems with the distro, so I like the idea behind something like this or SpiralLinux, but I wouldn't use either distro myself, because I find that the more a distro deviates from upstream and adds its own configurations, the harder it is to troubleshoot issues or configure them the way I like.
As for Xebian, I don't see the point of trying to make Debian Sid easier to install. It's a development release, guaranteed to have many bugs, and not really suitable for the average user. If you can't install and "declutter" sid yourself, it's better to be using the latest stable or even testing release.
I know Okular can do at least most of that. Don't think it's available for Mac OS X, though.
Depends on a few factors, AFAIK as a non-lawyer. If the license allows closed-source derivatives (i.e. is permissive rather than copyleft), then anyone can create a closed-source version with all of the contributors' changes, including the original maintainer. And anyone can choose to keep it open-source. The community contributions still to some extent belong to the contributors, though the license waives most of their rights.
Some projects are copyleft, but contributors are required to sign a license agreement (a CLA) which allows a single entity to change the license as they desire, including to closed-source - this is a good reason to avoid such projects. The contributors don't own their work in such a case, but they can still fork the old project as it was before being taken closed source.
In a copyleft (e.g. GPL) project with no CLA, it's illegal for anyone to make a closed-source version, and a major contributor could sue even the maintainer for doing so.
In all such cases, the change to a closed-source model does not erase the existence of the open-source code with community contributions. A fork is always possible.
You mean one that allows logging in and posting to Twitter aka X, without a significant fee? Not to my knowledge. Lately Elon and co. have been working to make third party clients completely impossible to develop, so it's either use the official app, use the website, or quit Twitter.
If you just want to browse Twitter, I don't know of any options for that either, but keep an eye on Nitter; currently it does not work, but they're apparently working on a way to work around Twitter's latest changes.
To be honest, I've never used or heard of a keyboard or mouse that doesn't work with Linux. The space is pretty well standardized so generic drivers work for everything. I don't have experience with keyboard layouts that aren't English QWERTY, though. The safest option would be something basic from a major brand, extra stuff like RGB is not 100% guaranteed to work.
I'd recommend using Fedora Workstation, it was a great experience back when I myself had an HP ENVY "fliptop". Anything with GNOME as its desktop environment should be perfect.
I use https://vgy.me/ currently. Unfortunately I'm not aware of any open-source options, but vgy at least seems friendly and easy to work with.
Between the three I'd go for Linux Mint. It was my first distro too, and it makes the setup process very easy, especially for users coming from Windows. Manjaro and Ubuntu are fine, plenty of people I know love them, but they've both made some decisions in recent years that I don't like. The former being negligent with security updates, and the latter forcing their own, worse, package manager on users. You shouldn't have any issues with Mint.
Most of the apps you mentioned are available for Linux, including Teams and VirtualBox, though you'll probably have to download those from their respective websites. Office 365 still works from a web browser, and you can open its documents locally with LibreOffice (though more complicated documents might have some formatting messed up). I haven't heard of uPlay, but there is an unofficial Linux client for Epic Games (called Heroic Launcher), and ~90% of Windows games either support Linux or work through a compatibility layer such as Proton.
There is a complete set of free assets, in the form of Freedoom. Also, the official Steam version is closed-source, so make sure you're getting a free source port. (Most distros have a few in their repos, and Freedoom+GZDoom is also in Flathub.)
I understand it’s highly customizable.
That is true, it's one of the main benefits to using Linux!
I understand it’s a lot of manual work, though, at least… it sounds like it? From what I’ve seen people say, it seems like you need to remember a lot of codes and functions to do basic things unless you install interfaces for things?
That depends. Most Linux distros come with all the necessary interfaces for those basic things by default, but a few will require you to set them up with the command-line interface (CLI). It's just a good idea to learn CLI commands because they're more reliable, more consistent across distros, and often required for advanced things or for troubleshooting.
IMHO, the main challenges of Linux are:
- Having to make configuration choices that Windows and OS X make for you (distros can go a long way in this regard, but you still have to choose a distro)
- Having to install Linux, configure it, and solve problems yourself. (Basically, you use it at your own risk. If you run into issues, I recommend asking a friend, or failing that, asking on one of the many available Linux support forums (like this one) and chatrooms.)
On the other hand, Linux is easier to use in some ways:
- Distros typically provide software repositories (basically app stores) which are better curated than those of Windows or OS X. They can negate the need to search online for downloads, and make it easy to update the system at your convenience.
- Viruses and malware for Linux are extremely rare.
- There are fewer restrictions on what you can do with your computer, which makes customization much easier. There are no ads, nags, "premium editions", or other commercial BS in Linux.
I also am under the impression that Linux isn’t the greatest for most games? Or at least, that’s what I heard a lot years ago, I don’t know if it’s still true (or if it was even true back then). If that’s still a thing, is it because Windows is just what everyone defaults to when designing software? How viable is gaming on Linux?
IMO, quite viable, thanks in large part to Valve's efforts with SteamOS and the Steam Deck. A lot of games have official support for Linux now, and those that don't run pretty much seamlessly through one or both of the Windows compatibility layers, Wine and Proton. Linux used to be pretty bad for gaming, but I think it's close to on par with Windows now. It's arguably even better for emulators.
And how does one even… go about setting up Linux? How do you choose what er… version? Type? Ah, distro? Again this… terminology is foreign to me, I’m not fully sure what I’m saying. Would I have to whipe a laptop of Windows to install Linux on it? How would I do that?
A "distro" is basically a version of Linux. More precisely, the operating system we call "Linux" or sometimes "GNU/Linux" is really just a bunch of disparate pieces of software that together could make an operating system, and a "Linux distro" is an operating system pieced together from those parts.
As for the choice of distro, I wouldn't overthink it. There's a small chance your hardware won't be supported by a given distro, or the install process will be more "hands-on" and difficult, but that applies to only a minority of distros. I personally am fond of Debian, though it's a more "power user" oriented distro and can be hard to install; you might find one of its derivatives, like Q4OS or Linux Mint easier to set up.
There is a way to "dual-boot" Linux alongside Windows, but it can be unreliable, and you will need to partition your hard drive to give them both dedicated space. There are tutorials for this that you can look up easily, but unless you really need Windows, "wiping your hard drive" will be the smoother option. Back up anything important first, and then (on most distros) the installer will make it easy; you'll likely just have to select your hard disk and an option to erase it. If you just want to try Linux without making it your main OS, I recommend installing it a virtual machine, such as Oracle VirtualBox or VMWare Player.
I have ADHD and Autism and combined, the whole idea of jumping into this is so goddamn overwhelming to consider figuring it out all by myself.
Speaking as a fellow autistic, I think the ability to hyperfixate helped me a lot with Linux, haha. But it is a lot, so I don't blame you for being overwhelmed. As I said, once the setup is finished it's quite easy to use, and the more advanced stuff, you can learn as you go along. So don't worry too much.
I hope this wasn't too long/hard to understand for you. Feel free to message me if you need help getting set up with Linux, or need clarification on what I've said. I love helping people with stuff like this.
Most of what you can do with Debian and Fedora, you can also do with Mint. You can even install KDE on Mint, and configure it however you want. Debian is a bit nicer to customize, though, because it's extremely stable and most of its apps keep their "vanilla" configurations, or at least a configuration unlikely to cause bugs.