hellothere

joined 1 year ago
[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

What's that, liberals siding with fascists over socialists yet again? Surely we've learnt this lesson enough times by now...

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago

Tories being obstructionist cunts? Never!

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

While I'm glad she's done this, let's not forget that Warsi is hardly the bastion of enlightened centrism, let alone anything progressive.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

My argument since the election has essentially been, until the budget we don't know what political decisions Reeves will make.

Reclassifying debt and assets in line with the IMF absolutely makes sense economically, and the Tories didn't do it for political (ie brutalise the poor) reasons.

If the budget comes, and meaningful investment is not a centrepiece, then we can justifibly start calling Reeves many names under the sun, but until then, we cannot in good faith pretend we know what she'll do.

Yes, I'm giving her the benefit of the doubt. I really hope I'm right in doing so.

If I'm not, then fair enough, and I won't pretend otherwise.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

If you get a good one

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

In a word, yes.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Go to a hardcore show.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Setting the bar at pension credit recipients is too low, I would have much rather they brought forward the expected £400 uplift to the state pension, and removed the winter fuel payment at the same time. That way everyone who needs it would still get it, and those with private pensions / other sources of income would pay more income tax.

The moral argument for why poor pensioners need the payment is valid, but keep in mind that less pensioners live in poverty than working people - which is wild when you consider the demographic bulge the boomers represent. Neither children nor pensioners should freeze over winter in one of the largest economies in the world, with relatively moderate winters.

Lastly, about 25% of pensioners live in households with over £1m in assets. Granted, most of that wealth is tied up in the house, but if you own a £1m house that you can't afford to heat, bluntly, fucking move.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I asked ChatGPT what it thought of this:

The phrase "rats leaving a sinking ship" often conjures images of individuals abandoning a failing situation in search of safety, reflecting a natural instinct for self-preservation. In the world of tech, leadership changes can evoke similar sentiments, particularly when a high-profile figure like Mira Murati steps down as CTO. Her departure may signal deeper issues within the company, leading to speculation about its stability and future direction. Just as rats flee a deteriorating vessel, employees and stakeholders might interpret her exit as a warning sign, prompting concerns about the organization's health and long-term viability.

Murati’s tenure as CTO brought innovation and leadership, positioning the company as a front-runner in its industry. Her decision to leave could suggest an unraveling of the strategic vision that once propelled the organization forward. This parallel highlights the instinctive reaction of those within the company; employees may feel uncertain about their future, mirroring the chaos and trepidation felt aboard a ship in distress. The fear of instability can lead to a wave of resignations, as others seek to secure their own positions before the situation worsens.

However, not every departure must be viewed through a negative lens. Just as rats leaving a sinking ship might find new, more promising environments, Murati’s exit could open doors for fresh leadership and innovative ideas. This shift might provide an opportunity for rejuvenation and growth within the company, allowing it to adapt and evolve. While the immediate reaction may be one of alarm, such transitions can also lead to renewed focus and a stronger foundation, illustrating that change—though often unsettling—can ultimately foster resilience and progress.

Emphasis mine - no shit!

Also, good luck to those enterprising rats finding a more promising environment in the, er, sea...

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 week ago (7 children)

A 20 year deal, with no power produced until 2028?

Either MS really do know something we don't, or this bubble has grained a layer of strontium.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The lying liar is lying? No, shurely knot!

 

It’s midnight on the edge of Clapham Common in early September. The streets are eerily quiet as a shadowy figure in black shirt, shorts and baseball cap emerges from the common. He is wearing a red face mask, his features, except for some blond locks, hidden from view.

 

Petrified fucking terror. That's the first thing you think when you look at Labour. A barely-concealed, buttoned-up, can't-sleep-at-night anxiety, lurking just behind the eyes. They're scared they'll fluff it. They're scared that in the white heat of the election campaign, the Tories will find some policy in their manifesto to weaponise against them and the whole thing will come crashing down.

view more: next ›